首页> 外文OA文献 >An aggregated fuzzy model for the selection of a managed security service provider
【2h】

An aggregated fuzzy model for the selection of a managed security service provider

机译:用于选择托管安全服务提供商的聚合模糊模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study, by analyzing the related literature, the companies providing security services and, more importantly, the data provided by a group of experts, a novel set of 39 criteria is extracted which assists the Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) selection process. The set is further categorized into eight general classes. The validity and weights of these criteria are measured by a group of experts in Iran. Due to the large number and often conflicting criteria, and the qualitative nature of the evaluations of the service providers, fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods (FMCDM) are adopted. In order to demonstrate the application of the proposed model, a numerical example is included, in which eight service providers are evaluated by four decision makers applying fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy VIKOR, fuzzy Group ELECTRE, and fuzzy SAW methods. Owing to the variations of the outputs of the applied MCDM methods, they are further analyzed by an aggregation method to propose a unique service provider. A comparison between the output of the aggregation method and the four applied Fuzzy MCDM methods is also made with the help of Euclidean, Hamming, Manhattan and Chebyshev distances. The comparison shows the minimum diversion between the outputs of the Fuzzy TOPSIS and the aggregation method, which indicates the appropriateness of the fuzzy TOPSIS method in this particular problem.
机译:在这项研究中,通过分析相关文献,提供安全服务的公司以及更重要的是,由一组专家提供的数据,提取了一组新的39条标准,这些标准有助于管理安全服务提供商(MSSP)的选择过程。该集合进一步分为八类。这些标准的有效性和权重由伊朗的一组专家衡量。由于标准数量众多且经常相互冲突,并且服务提供商的评估具有定性性质,因此采用了模糊多标准决策方法(FMCDM)。为了演示该模型的应用,包括一个数值示例,其中四个决策者使用模糊TOPSIS,模糊VIKOR,模糊Group ELECTRE和模糊SAW方法对八个服务提供商进行了评估。由于所应用的MCDM方法输出的变化,将通过聚合方法对其进行进一步分析,以提出唯一的服务提供者。借助欧几里得距离,汉明距离,曼哈顿距离和切比雪夫距离,对聚合方法的输出与四种应用的模糊MCDM方法的输出进行了比较。比较结果显示了模糊TOPSIS输出和聚合方法之间的最小转移,这表明模糊TOPSIS方法在此特定问题中的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号